Robotics in Manufacturing

Head to head

ABB IRB 1100 vs FANUC M-10iD/12

A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.

ABB2 wins
ABB IRB 1100

Small precise arm for assembly and dispensing

FANUC2 wins
FANUC M-10iD/12

Slim, hollow-wrist mid-payload for dense cells.

Specification duel

Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.

4 kg
Payload
12 kg
580 mm
Reach
1,441 mm
±0.01 mm
Repeatability
±0.02 mm
6
Axes
6
21 kg
Robot mass
145 kg
2018
Introducedreference
2017

The verdict

FANUC M-10iD/12 carries more payload at 12 kg. FANUC M-10iD/12 reaches farther at 1441 mm. ABB IRB 1100 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.01 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.

ABB IRB 1100
  • +Very tight repeatability for small-parts work
  • +Compact size fits benchtop cells
  • +SafeMove options for shared workspace
  • +Fast for short-cycle assembly tasks
FANUC M-10iD/12
  • +Internal cable routing reduces snagging
  • +Strong reach-to-footprint ratio

Common questions

Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 1100 or the FANUC M-10iD/12?
The FANUC M-10iD/12 has more payload at 12 kg versus 4 kg.
Which reaches farther?
The FANUC M-10iD/12 has more reach at 1441 mm versus 580 mm.
Which is more precise?
The ABB IRB 1100 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.01 mm.
Should I choose the ABB IRB 1100 or the FANUC M-10iD/12?
Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 1100 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 4 kg and 580 mm. The FANUC M-10iD/12 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 12 kg and 1441 mm.