Head to head
ABB IRB 460 vs FANUC M-410iC/185
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB1 wins
ABB IRB 460
Compact four-axis palletizer with a low swing profile
FANUC3 wins
FANUC M-410iC/185
Heavy-duty palletizer for bagged and boxed goods
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
110 kg
Payload
185 kg
2,400 mm
Reach
3,143 mm
±0.2 mm
Repeatability
±0.05 mm
4
Axes
4
925 kg
Robot mass
1,600 kg
2011
Introducedreference
Not confirmed
The verdict
FANUC M-410iC/185 carries more payload at 185 kg. FANUC M-410iC/185 reaches farther at 3143 mm. FANUC M-410iC/185 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm. Both are palletizing arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 460 →
- +Low-profile design fits tight overhead clearance
- +Fast cycle rate for case palletizing
- +Compact footprint versus reach
- +Simple four-axis maintenance
FANUC M-410iC/185 →
- +Long reach covers multiple pallet positions
- +High payload handles bagged and bulk loads
- +Consistent stacking accuracy at speed
- +Compatible with FANUC palletizing software tools
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 460 or the FANUC M-410iC/185?
- The FANUC M-410iC/185 has more payload at 185 kg versus 110 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The FANUC M-410iC/185 has more reach at 3143 mm versus 2400 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The FANUC M-410iC/185 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 460 or the FANUC M-410iC/185?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 460 is a palletizing arm at 110 kg and 2400 mm. The FANUC M-410iC/185 is a palletizing arm at 185 kg and 3143 mm.