Head to head
ABB IRB 5710 vs Kawasaki RS080N
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB3 wins
ABB IRB 5710
Slim paint-family arm for finishing and dispensing
Kawasaki1 wins
Kawasaki RS080N
Mid-heavy arm for material handling and palletizing support
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
110 kg
Payload
80 kg
2,300 mm
Reach
2,100 mm
±0.04 mm
Repeatability
±0.06 mm
6
Axes
6
830 kg
Robot mass
555 kg
2022
Introducedreference
Not confirmed
The verdict
ABB IRB 5710 carries more payload at 110 kg. ABB IRB 5710 reaches farther at 2300 mm. ABB IRB 5710 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.04 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 5710 →
- +Slim profile for tight booth clearance
- +Sealed construction for solvent exposure
- +Long reach for full-panel coverage
- +Internal process line routing
Kawasaki RS080N →
- +Strong payload-to-footprint ratio
- +Rigid arm holds accuracy at full reach
- +Reliable in continuous multi-shift use
- +Compatible with Kawasaki's palletizing software
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 5710 or the Kawasaki RS080N?
- The ABB IRB 5710 has more payload at 110 kg versus 80 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The ABB IRB 5710 has more reach at 2300 mm versus 2100 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The ABB IRB 5710 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.04 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 5710 or the Kawasaki RS080N?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 5710 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 110 kg and 2300 mm. The Kawasaki RS080N is a 6-axis industrial arm at 80 kg and 2100 mm.