Robotics in Manufacturing

Head to head

ABB IRB 6640 vs FANUC M-2000iA/1700L

A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.

ABB2 wins
ABB IRB 6640

Heavy-payload foundry-proven material handler

FANUC2 wins
FANUC M-2000iA/1700L

One of the strongest six-axis robots built.

Specification duel

Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.

235 kg
Payload
1,700 kg
2,550 mm
Reach
4,683 mm
±0.05 mm
Repeatability
±0.27 mm
6
Axes
6
1,310 kg
Robot mass
12,500 kg
2007
Introducedreference
2015

The verdict

FANUC M-2000iA/1700L carries more payload at 1700 kg. FANUC M-2000iA/1700L reaches farther at 4683 mm. ABB IRB 6640 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.

ABB IRB 6640
  • +Proven in foundry and press-tending duty
  • +High payload with foundry-sealed options
  • +Rigid structure holds accuracy under load
  • +Long service life in continuous operation
FANUC M-2000iA/1700L
  • +Extreme payload
  • +Lifts full assemblies in one pick

Common questions

Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC M-2000iA/1700L?
The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L has more payload at 1700 kg versus 235 kg.
Which reaches farther?
The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L has more reach at 4683 mm versus 2550 mm.
Which is more precise?
The ABB IRB 6640 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm.
Should I choose the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC M-2000iA/1700L?
Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 6640 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 235 kg and 2550 mm. The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L is a 6-axis industrial arm at 1700 kg and 4683 mm.