Head to head
ABB IRB 6640 vs FANUC M-2000iA/1700L
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB2 wins
ABB IRB 6640
Heavy-payload foundry-proven material handler
FANUC2 wins
FANUC M-2000iA/1700L
One of the strongest six-axis robots built.
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
235 kg
Payload
1,700 kg
2,550 mm
Reach
4,683 mm
±0.05 mm
Repeatability
±0.27 mm
6
Axes
6
1,310 kg
Robot mass
12,500 kg
2007
Introducedreference
2015
The verdict
FANUC M-2000iA/1700L carries more payload at 1700 kg. FANUC M-2000iA/1700L reaches farther at 4683 mm. ABB IRB 6640 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 6640 →
- +Proven in foundry and press-tending duty
- +High payload with foundry-sealed options
- +Rigid structure holds accuracy under load
- +Long service life in continuous operation
FANUC M-2000iA/1700L →
- +Extreme payload
- +Lifts full assemblies in one pick
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC M-2000iA/1700L?
- The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L has more payload at 1700 kg versus 235 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L has more reach at 4683 mm versus 2550 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The ABB IRB 6640 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC M-2000iA/1700L?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 6640 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 235 kg and 2550 mm. The FANUC M-2000iA/1700L is a 6-axis industrial arm at 1700 kg and 4683 mm.