Head to head
ABB IRB 6640 vs FANUC R-1000iA/80F
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB2 wins
ABB IRB 6640
Heavy-payload foundry-proven material handler
FANUC2 wins
FANUC R-1000iA/80F
Foundry-rated arm for harsh handling duty
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
235 kg
Payload
80 kg
2,550 mm
Reach
2,230 mm
±0.05 mm
Repeatability
±0.03 mm
6
Axes
6
1,310 kg
Robot mass
620 kg
2007
Introducedreference
Not confirmed
The verdict
ABB IRB 6640 carries more payload at 235 kg. ABB IRB 6640 reaches farther at 2550 mm. FANUC R-1000iA/80F holds tighter repeatability at ±0.03 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 6640 →
- +Proven in foundry and press-tending duty
- +High payload with foundry-sealed options
- +Rigid structure holds accuracy under load
- +Long service life in continuous operation
FANUC R-1000iA/80F →
- +Sealed construction for foundry and washdown duty
- +High payload with a compact base
- +Fast acceleration for casting cycle times
- +Heat-resistant cabling option available
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC R-1000iA/80F?
- The ABB IRB 6640 has more payload at 235 kg versus 80 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The ABB IRB 6640 has more reach at 2550 mm versus 2230 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The FANUC R-1000iA/80F holds tighter repeatability at ±0.03 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC R-1000iA/80F?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 6640 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 235 kg and 2550 mm. The FANUC R-1000iA/80F is a 6-axis industrial arm at 80 kg and 2230 mm.