Head to head
ABB IRB 6700 vs FANUC M-900iB/700
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB3 wins
ABB IRB 6700
ABB's flagship heavy six-axis family.
FANUC1 wins
FANUC M-900iB/700
Heavy-payload giant for press tending and casting
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
150 kg
Payload
700 kg
3,200 mm
Reach
2,832 mm
±0.05 mm
Repeatability
±0.1 mm
6
Axes
6
1,280 kg
Robot mass
2,800 kg
2013
Introducedreference
Not confirmed
The verdict
FANUC M-900iB/700 carries more payload at 700 kg. ABB IRB 6700 reaches farther at 3200 mm. ABB IRB 6700 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 6700 →
- +Long reach variants
- +Strong service tooling
FANUC M-900iB/700 →
- +Very high payload for a standard six-axis arm
- +Rigid structure holds accuracy under heavy loads
- +Long service life in foundry and press duty
- +Wide selection of heavy-duty EOAT partners
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 6700 or the FANUC M-900iB/700?
- The FANUC M-900iB/700 has more payload at 700 kg versus 150 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The ABB IRB 6700 has more reach at 3200 mm versus 2832 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The ABB IRB 6700 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 6700 or the FANUC M-900iB/700?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 6700 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 150 kg and 3200 mm. The FANUC M-900iB/700 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 700 kg and 2832 mm.