Head to head
Epson VT6 vs Mitsubishi RV-7FR
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
Compact folded-arm robot for tight assembly cells
Compact precise arm for assembly and handling
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
The verdict
The specs separate them here: the Epson VT6 reaches farther, 920 mm to 713 mm. If precision drives the job, the Mitsubishi RV-7FR holds the tighter repeatability at ±0.02 mm. They run different controllers, the Epson VT6 on the Built-in controller and the Mitsubishi RV-7FR on the CR800-D, so whichever platform your team already programs and stocks parts for is a real tiebreaker. Both are aimed at assembly and machine tending, with the Epson VT6 stretching to packaging and the Mitsubishi RV-7FR to material handling.
- Folded-arm design reduces swept volume
- Consistent programming environment with Epson SCARA robots
- Competitive cost for the payload class
- Good fit for dense multi-robot cells
- Tight repeatability in a compact package
- Strong integration with Mitsubishi PLC ecosystems
- Multiple mounting orientations
- Reliable in continuous light-duty operation
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the Epson VT6 or the Mitsubishi RV-7FR?
- The Mitsubishi RV-7FR has more payload at 7 kg versus 6 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The Epson VT6 has more reach at 920 mm versus 713 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The Mitsubishi RV-7FR holds tighter repeatability at ±0.02 mm.
- Should I choose the Epson VT6 or the Mitsubishi RV-7FR?
- Match the pick to the job. The Epson VT6 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 6 kg and 920 mm. The Mitsubishi RV-7FR is a 6-axis industrial arm at 7 kg and 713 mm.