Head to head
FANUC M-710iC/70 vs Kawasaki RS080N
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
FANUC1 wins
FANUC M-710iC/70
Higher-payload sibling for pallet and part transfer
Kawasaki3 wins
Kawasaki RS080N
Mid-heavy arm for material handling and palletizing support
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
70 kg
Payload
80 kg
2,050 mm
Reach
2,100 mm
±0.04 mm
Repeatability
±0.06 mm
6
Axes
6
560 kg
Robot mass
555 kg
2006
Introducedreference
Not confirmed
The verdict
Kawasaki RS080N carries more payload at 80 kg. Kawasaki RS080N reaches farther at 2100 mm. FANUC M-710iC/70 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.04 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
FANUC M-710iC/70 →
- +Higher payload without a larger footprint
- +Same envelope as the M-710iC/50
- +Robust for continuous multi-shift duty
- +Wide accessory and EOAT ecosystem
Kawasaki RS080N →
- +Strong payload-to-footprint ratio
- +Rigid arm holds accuracy at full reach
- +Reliable in continuous multi-shift use
- +Compatible with Kawasaki's palletizing software
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the FANUC M-710iC/70 or the Kawasaki RS080N?
- The Kawasaki RS080N has more payload at 80 kg versus 70 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The Kawasaki RS080N has more reach at 2100 mm versus 2050 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The FANUC M-710iC/70 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.04 mm.
- Should I choose the FANUC M-710iC/70 or the Kawasaki RS080N?
- Match the pick to the job. The FANUC M-710iC/70 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 70 kg and 2050 mm. The Kawasaki RS080N is a 6-axis industrial arm at 80 kg and 2100 mm.