Head to head
ABB IRB 6640 vs FANUC LR Mate 200iD
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
ABB2 wins
ABB IRB 6640
Heavy-payload foundry-proven material handler
FANUC2 wins
FANUC LR Mate 200iD
The benchmark tabletop six-axis for tending and assembly.
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
235 kg
Payload
7 kg
2,550 mm
Reach
717 mm
±0.05 mm
Repeatability
±0.01 mm
6
Axes
6
1,310 kg
Robot mass
25 kg
2007
Introducedreference
2013
The verdict
ABB IRB 6640 carries more payload at 235 kg. ABB IRB 6640 reaches farther at 2550 mm. FANUC LR Mate 200iD holds tighter repeatability at ±0.01 mm. Both are 6-axis industrial arms, so the choice comes down to payload headroom, cell layout, and the controller and ecosystem you already run.
ABB IRB 6640 →
- +Proven in foundry and press-tending duty
- +High payload with foundry-sealed options
- +Rigid structure holds accuracy under load
- +Long service life in continuous operation
FANUC LR Mate 200iD →
- +Fast cycle times
- +Slim arm clears tight fixtures
- +Huge installed base and parts availability
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC LR Mate 200iD?
- The ABB IRB 6640 has more payload at 235 kg versus 7 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The ABB IRB 6640 has more reach at 2550 mm versus 717 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The FANUC LR Mate 200iD holds tighter repeatability at ±0.01 mm.
- Should I choose the ABB IRB 6640 or the FANUC LR Mate 200iD?
- Match the pick to the job. The ABB IRB 6640 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 235 kg and 2550 mm. The FANUC LR Mate 200iD is a 6-axis industrial arm at 7 kg and 717 mm.