Head to head
Comau NJ-220 vs KUKA KR 300 R2500
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
Heavy-payload arm for handling and press tending
High payload robot for heavy parts and tooling
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
The verdict
The specs separate them here: the KUKA KR 300 R2500 carries more, 300 kg to the Comau NJ-220's 220 kg. If precision drives the job, the KUKA KR 300 R2500 holds the tighter repeatability at ±0.06 mm. They run different controllers, the Comau NJ-220 on the C5G and the KUKA KR 300 R2500 on the KR C4, so whichever platform your team already programs and stocks parts for is a real tiebreaker. Both are aimed at material handling and machine tending, with the KUKA KR 300 R2500 to press tending.
- High payload for press and foundry duty
- Rigid structure for consistent accuracy under load
- Long reach for large-part transfer
- Proven in automotive body shop lines
- High payload with a manageable footprint
- Rigid arm structure for heavy tooling
- Good repeatability given its load class
- Established support network
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the Comau NJ-220 or the KUKA KR 300 R2500?
- The KUKA KR 300 R2500 has more payload at 300 kg versus 220 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The Comau NJ-220 has more reach at 2701 mm versus 2496 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The KUKA KR 300 R2500 holds tighter repeatability at ±0.06 mm.
- Should I choose the Comau NJ-220 or the KUKA KR 300 R2500?
- Match the pick to the job. The Comau NJ-220 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 220 kg and 2701 mm. The KUKA KR 300 R2500 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 300 kg and 2496 mm.