Head to head
Kawasaki duAro vs KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
Dual arm SCARA style cobot for tabletop assembly
Easy to program cobot for light assembly and pick tasks
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
The verdict
The specs separate them here: the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 carries more, 3 kg to the Kawasaki duAro's 2 kg. If precision drives the job, the Kawasaki duAro holds the tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm. They run different controllers, the Kawasaki duAro on the F61 and the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 on the KR C5 micro, so whichever platform your team already programs and stocks parts for is a real tiebreaker. Mounting options differ: the Kawasaki duAro lists Floor, and the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 lists Floor, Wall, Ceiling, and Angle. Both are aimed at collaborative assembly and small parts handling, with the Kawasaki duAro stretching to kitting and the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 to pick and place.
Choose this one when
Job fit first, then the controller and cell constraints that decide which arm you can actually install.
Choose the Kawasaki duAro when
- Dual arm layout mimics a human work station
- Low profile base fits tabletop lines
- Collaborative operation for many light tasks
- Simple direct teaching programming
Watch for
- Limited payload per arm
- Horizontal SCARA style motion is not suited to all part geometries
Choose the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 when
- Fast setup with app based programming
- Low entry cost for a KUKA cobot
- Compact size fits benchtop cells
- Designed for collaborative applications
Watch for
- Light payload limits it to small parts
- Speed is capped by collaborative safety limits
Controller ecosystem
Programming habits, spare parts, and pendant familiarity often decide the pick when payloads are close.
- Brand
- Kawasaki
- Controller
- F61
- Class
- collaborative
Service, spares, and pendant training for the Kawasaki duAro run through Kawasaki's F61 stack.
- Brand
- KUKA
- Controller
- KR C5 micro
- Class
- collaborative
Service, spares, and pendant training for the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 run through KUKA's KR C5 micro stack.
These arms run different controllers (F61 vs KR C5 micro). If your team already programs one of them, retraining programmers and stocking a second set of spares usually costs more than a small payload or reach advantage on paper.
Mounting, footprint, and mass
How the arm can be oriented in the cell, and how much mass you have to mount.
| Field | Kawasaki duAro | KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 |
|---|---|---|
| Mounting | Floor | Floor, Wall, Ceiling, and Angle |
| Robot mass | 207 kg | 22.8 kg |
| Protection (IP) | Not confirmed | IP30 |
Heavier arms want stiffer bases and more clearance around the swept volume, and they push freight and rigging costs up on the install. IP ratings only cover the section they name, so a wrist-only rating protects the wrist and nothing else; check the body rating separately before you commit the arm to a washdown or dusty cell.
Application fit
Where each arm is aimed, based on the applications listed on its robot page.
Both pages list collaborative assembly and small parts handling, with the differences below.
Kawasaki duAro also covers
KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 also covers
Speed and cycle-time planning
Speed is rarely a single datasheet number across brands. Use payload, reach, and class as the planning frame, then confirm cycle time in a path study.
The Kawasaki duAro is a collaborative arm rated 2 kg at 760 mm with ±0.05 mm repeatability. The KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 is a collaborative arm rated 3 kg at 760 mm with ±0.1 mm. Class changes how speed shows up in a cell: collaborative arms slow down near people and can speed up in a guarded mode, while industrial arms run at rated speed inside a fence or scanner field. Which arm cycles faster on your part depends on the path, the payload, and the safeguarding, so confirm the takt with a path study before you quote it.
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the Kawasaki duAro or the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760?
- The KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 has more payload at 3 kg versus 2 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The Kawasaki duAro and KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 match at 760 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- The Kawasaki duAro holds tighter repeatability at ±0.05 mm.
- Should I choose the Kawasaki duAro or the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760?
- Match the pick to the job. The Kawasaki duAro is a collaborative arm at 2 kg and 760 mm. The KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 is a collaborative arm at 3 kg and 760 mm.
- Do the Kawasaki duAro and KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 use the same controller?
- No. The Kawasaki duAro uses F61 and the KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 uses KR C5 micro.
- How do the IP ratings compare?
- The Kawasaki duAro is rated not confirmed. The KUKA LBR iisy 3 R760 is rated IP30. Check wrist versus body coverage before washdown or dusty cells.