Head to head
KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) vs KUKA KR 300 R2500
A specification duel across payload, reach, precision, and footprint, with a plain read on which arm suits which job.
Heavy Quantec arm for body shops.
High payload robot for heavy parts and tooling
Specification duel
Green marks the stronger figure. Unconfirmed specs are shown but not scored.
The verdict
The specs separate them here: the KUKA KR 300 R2500 carries more, 300 kg to the KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec)'s 210 kg. Both run the KR C4 controller, so programming, spare parts, and operator familiarity carry across either way. For a tight or overhead cell, the KUKA KR 300 R2500 lists Ceiling mounting, which the other does not. Both are aimed at material handling, with the KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) stretching to spot welding and the KUKA KR 300 R2500 to palletizing and press tending.
- Robust for continuous duty
- Wide payload family
- High payload with a manageable footprint
- Rigid arm structure for heavy tooling
- Good repeatability given its load class
- Established support network
Common questions
- Which has more payload, the KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) or the KUKA KR 300 R2500?
- The KUKA KR 300 R2500 has more payload at 300 kg versus 210 kg.
- Which reaches farther?
- The KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) has more reach at 2696 mm versus 2496 mm.
- Which is more precise?
- Both are rated at ±0.06 mm repeatability.
- Should I choose the KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) or the KUKA KR 300 R2500?
- Match the pick to the job. The KUKA KR 210 R2700 (Quantec) is a 6-axis industrial arm at 210 kg and 2696 mm. The KUKA KR 300 R2500 is a 6-axis industrial arm at 300 kg and 2496 mm.